Understanding Types of Cyclists Nationally

Transportation professionals who are developing plans and projects that aim to change people's travel behavior - such as getting more people to bicycle - need to understand the people they are targeting. To do so, planners and researchers have developed typologies of cyclists; however, many of these typologies are based upon surveys of current cyclists and, therefore, are of limited use in planning to attract new people to bicycling for transportation. One exception is the "Four Types of Cyclists" typology developed by Roger Geller, the Bicycle Coordinator for the city of Portland, OR. Portland, which places Portland residents into one of four groups: Strong and the Fearless; Enthused and the Confident; Interested but Concerned; and No Way No How. The typology is now being used throughout the U.S. by cities in their bicycle planning. However, there are no data that confirm the applicability of the typology beyond Portland. Previous Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC) funded research examined this typology using a random survey of adults from the Portland region. The findings validated the use of the Four Types and provided insights on what might get the "interested but concerned" group to bicycle more for transportation. This research project will collect data nationally to answer the following questions: (1) Does the Four Types of Cyclists typology apply nationally? Or is there another, more appropriate typology? (2) What are the demographic characteristics and attitudes of each type of cyclist? (3) How does the existing environment, including bicycle infrastructure, affect the share of people in each category/type? (4) What programs or infrastructure might increase bicycling for transportation amongst the different types of cyclists in different environments? One outcome of meeting this objective is a better understanding of the market for increasing bicycling for transportation nationally. The project plans to carry out this objective by partnering with the National Association of Realtors (NAR) on a national survey. Because the NAR survey is aimed at exploring broader issues related to bicycling and walking, we have the opportunity to examine a second objective: understanding the role of bicycle infrastructure in housing decisions. Specifically, what role does bicycle infrastructure play in people's housing decisions? And what is the demand for more bikeable neighborhoods?

Language

• English

Project

• Status: Completed
• Funding: $139493.00
• Contract Numbers:

  NITC 668

• Sponsor Organizations:

  National Association of Realtors

  430 N Michigan Ave
  Chicago, IL  United States  60611

  Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

  P.O. Box 2316
  College Road East and Route 1
  Princeton, NJ  United States  08543-2316

  Research and Innovative Technology Administration

  University Transportation Centers Program
  1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
  Washington, DC  United States  20590
• Project Managers:

  Hagedorn, Hau

• Performing Organizations:

  Portland State University

  Center for Urban Studies, P.O. Box 751
  Portland, OR  United States  97207-0751
• Principal Investigators:

  McNeil, Nathan

  Dill, Jennifer

• Start Date: 20140101
• Expected Completion Date: 20160131
• Actual Completion Date: 20161201
• Source Data: RiP Project 35806

Subject/Index Terms

• TRT Terms: Bicycle travel; Data collection; Demographics; Nonmotorized transportation; Transportation planning; Travel behavior; Travel surveys; Walking
• Uncontrolled Terms: Typology
• Geographic Terms: Portland (Oregon)
• Subject Areas: Pedestrians and Bicyclists; Policy;

Filing Info

• Accession Number: 01501098
• Record Type: Research project
• Source Agency: National Institute for Transportation and Communities
• Contract Numbers: NITC 668
• Files: UTC, RIP
• Created Date: Dec 11 2013 1:01AM