Research in Progress (RIP) https://rip.trb.org/ en-us Copyright © 2024. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod) tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod) Research in Progress (RIP) https://rip.trb.org/Images/PageHeader-wTitle-RIP.jpg https://rip.trb.org/ Geotechnical Asset Management Program in the State of Georgia – Phase I https://rip.trb.org/View/2342051 Tue, 20 Feb 2024 12:31:46 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2342051 Web-Based Tool to Advance Geotechnical Data Interchange and Reliability-Based Site Characterization https://rip.trb.org/View/2296662 Tue, 28 Nov 2023 10:41:30 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2296662 Evaluation and Incorporation of Site and Laboratory Variability into LRFD Design of Pile Foundations – Phase 2 https://rip.trb.org/View/2292744 Tue, 21 Nov 2023 08:17:38 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2292744 Improved Geotechnical Correlations for Lateral Pile Analysis https://rip.trb.org/View/2270164 Thu, 19 Oct 2023 14:12:12 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2270164 Development and Pilot Testing of a Geotechnical Geodatabase to Improve Understanding of Shallow Subsurface Conditions https://rip.trb.org/View/2270147 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 16:26:14 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2270147 SPR-4845: Investigate Existing Foundation Geotechnical Parameters and Compare These Strengths, Based on Current LRFD Codes https://rip.trb.org/View/2270075 Wed, 18 Oct 2023 14:53:10 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2270075 Development of a Geotechnical Asset Management System for Slopes https://rip.trb.org/View/2255783 Tue, 26 Sep 2023 16:52:01 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2255783 Use of Innovative Geosynthetics to Improve the Resiliency of Highway Embankment Slopes Under Extreme Climatic Conditions https://rip.trb.org/View/2244349 Wed, 13 Sep 2023 11:48:37 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2244349 Linking Scour Evaluation and Data from Geotechnical, Erodibility, and Hydraulic Investigation-An Integrative Approach https://rip.trb.org/View/2236944 1.4) per Benedict and Knight (2017). Yet the model is applied in practice to intermediate and wide pier cases as well. In addition, the materials classified as “soils” include sand, and/or silt, and/or clay with a grain size distribution that can yield a bed soil behavior that may not be captured by a single parameter, such as D50. Approaches such as the HEC-18 model also lump the flow channel and bridge hydraulic and geometrical parameters with the bed erosion resistance parameters in one equation. While such an approach is simple to use, there is consensus in literature that it yields overly conservative scour estimates. On a fundamental level, the magnitude of erosion and scour can be assessed through knowledge of the flow-induced shear stress, the soil’s erodibility parameters, which include the critical shear stress (τc), co-efficient of erodibility (α'), and m, which is “an exponent defining the functional variation of the soil erosion rate with the flow-induced shear stress.” This approach is fundamentally implemented in the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Hydraulic Toolbox and adopted by the NextScour Program. In parallel, geotechnical site investigation by the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) commonly involves the performance of the Standard Penetration Test (SPT), and the retrieval of soil samples for characterization of physical and engineering properties. As such, there is an opportunity to obtain the site-specific erodibility (τc, α', and m) through linking such parameters with the geotechnical data for a rational assessment of site-specific scour magnitude, accounting for variability of channel-bed soil layers with depth. The objectives of the study proposed herein are: (a) to provide a means of estimating the magnitude of sediment erodibility parameters through correlation with physical and engineering parameters obtained from site geotechnical investigation; and (b) to provide correlations between flow parameters and the flow-induced shear stress to facilitate the computation of scour and erosion magnitude for piers, abutments, and embankments. A main guidance of the proposed research is relying on data traditionally obtained during geotechnical investigation including the soils’ engineering and physical properties and the blow count per foot “N-value” obtained from the SPT. The research will advance the assessment of scour at the following fronts: i. Correlation of the erodibility parameters (τc, α', and m) with the soils’ engineering and physical properties that include, for example, grain size distribution, Atterberg limits, percent clay content, the blow count per foot “Nvalue” obtained from the SPT and the associate correlation with strength parameters. ii. Perform geological reconnaissance and monitor and collect data on hydrodynamic and morphodynamic response at bridge sites for which geotechnical investigation data are available. Such data will be synthetized and used in numerical modeling to assess the magnitude of the applied shear stresses (τ) under various flood events, and the corresponding temporal and spatial evolvement of scour at the bridge location at these sites. Specifically, characterization of τ will be performed for various flood recurrence periods and flow domain configuration including skewness, changing the flow angle of attack, flow constrictions, type of structure including pier classification, embankment, or abutment. The estimation of τ is needed for estimating the magnitude of scour. iii. Utilizing the site geological and geotechnical data and the results from the numerical simulations for the development of guidance for estimating the erodibility parameters. Then, perform comparative study of the scour magnitude obtained of the rational approach (implemented in the FHWA Hydraulic Toolbox) and the advanced numerical modeling. iv. Development of a plan and guidance policy for NCDOT implementation of the research findings in concert with the FHWA next generation scour program, NextScour.]]> Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:31:38 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2236944 Developing a Framework for Establishing a Risk-Based Geotechnical Asset Management Program in Illinois https://rip.trb.org/View/2229009 Mon, 14 Aug 2023 11:37:18 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2229009 Resilience Approaches for Pavements and Geotechnical Assets https://rip.trb.org/View/2149958 Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:50:30 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2149958 Michigan Cone Penetrometer Test Calibration https://rip.trb.org/View/2143711 Mon, 27 Mar 2023 12:01:25 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2143711 LiDAR for Geotechnical Applications https://rip.trb.org/View/2121044 Thu, 23 Feb 2023 11:30:18 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2121044 Incorporating Precipitation Data into Geotechnical Asset Management. https://rip.trb.org/View/2118359 Tue, 14 Feb 2023 14:55:42 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2118359 Field Evaluation of Geophysical Applications for DOTD https://rip.trb.org/View/2111935 Mon, 06 Feb 2023 12:01:35 GMT https://rip.trb.org/View/2111935