<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Research in Progress (RIP)</title>
    <link>https://rip.trb.org/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://rip.trb.org/Record/RSS?s=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" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <description></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright © 2026. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.</copyright>
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <managingEditor>tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>tris-trb@nas.edu (Bill McLeod)</webMaster>
    
    <item>
      <title>Wildlife Fencing Effectiveness in Reducing Crashes in the Western US</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2655748</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Research from a recent past study with data only from Utah identified the benefit-cost for installing wildlife fencing. Wildlife fencing projects are currently justified and determined for potential safety funding using only crash history and assumptions of the crash reduction and benefit of installing wildlife fencing. An expanded-scope research project to include data from other western states (Idaho, Wyoming, Colorado, and Nevada) will help quantify the reduction in crashes from installing wildlife fencing, providing a better comparison of safety benefit as compared to other safety projects and providing much better justification for when wildlife fencing installation is a worthy expenditure of safety funds, particularly federal funds that require a positive benefit-cost ratio.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 08:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2655748</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluating the I-25 Greenland Wildlife Overpass using network camera monitoring</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2643441</link>
      <description><![CDATA[This project will examine the effectiveness the largest wildlife overpasses in the U.S. and will explore the application of cameras with networked and high-quality imaging and other other methodologies. The study should inform future wildlife mitigation design decisions and advance the ability to study and monitor wildlife structures with increased safety and accuracy and reduced staff time and cost.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 13:59:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2643441</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Colorado Traffic and Animal Detection (COTAD) Model - Training the YOLO algorithm to Reliably Detect Colorado Wildlife, Pedestrians, and Vehicles</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2643439</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Reliable, automated detection of wildlife in real-time from optical and thermal camera images, and using detection to alert drivers by using dynamic wildlife warning signs (DWW), can save lives and protect property, as well as protect wildlife. This research will develop and train COTAD to detect Colorado large wildlife and test the algorithm near highways. If successful and paired with DWW, this project could become a highly used and cost effective tool to continue Colorado Department of Transportation's (CDOT’s) progress and leadership in reducing wildlife-vehicle collisions.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 13:50:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2643439</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Evaluating Bat Use of NDOT-managed Transportation Structures with Occupancy Modeling</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2636171</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Bridges, culverts, and other transportation structures sometimes provide roosting habitat for bats. Widespread use of these transportation structures across Nevada may potentially provide bat roosting habitat in areas naturally devoid of karst systems, and it is currently poorly documented how the presence of transportation structures in Nevada may increase the range of cavernicolous roosting bat species across the state. These structures may also supplement natural cave roosting habitat in the region that is sometimes disturbed or negatively impacted. Bridges, culverts, and other transportation structures vary in both design and materials, and, therefore, in their potential attractiveness to bats as roosting structures. Currently, Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) manages over 2,000 bridges and 52,000 culverts across Nevada. During a pilot study NDOT conducted in 2024, a subset of bridges and culverts were documented as supporting roosting use by bats. Thoroughly understanding the types of transportation structures that bats are using across Nevada, as well as the species, colony type, and degree of use, will provide NDOT an opportunity to efficiently plan maintenance activities on these structures so that future unexpected bridge and culvert maintenance work delays are minimized.

The objectives of this research are to: (1) Determine which transportation structures across Nevada are most likely to provide roosting habitat for bats through the development of a predictive model to improve NDOT bridge survey planning efficiency. (2) Complete 500 to 650 visits to transportation structures assuming approximately four culvert visits for every bridge visit (because bridge surveys are generally more time intensive) to determine which surveyed structures show no signs of use, show signs of use, and are actively occupied at the time of survey. (3) Determine the type of colony and seasonality of use for occupied structures. (4) Develop best management recommendations into an estimated 20-page bat management plan plus references and appendices based on survey results and a finalized model. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 14:09:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2636171</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Bat Use of Culverts in Virginia and Identifying Opportunities for Streamlining the Consultation Process for VDOT Projects: Phase I Study</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2617664</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) must comply with the Endangered Species Act (ESA) for transportation projects that may impact federally listed bat species. In 2024, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) released several updates relevant to these requirements, including the updated Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Programmatic Biological and Conference Opinion (PBO) for transportation projects. 

Although these updates and associated tools include several changes to improve consultation efficiencies, certain aspects of the coordination process remain outside their scope. In addition, structure assessments for bat occupancy represent a significant workload for VDOT and USFWS staff and an area where additional research is needed in Virginia. An understanding of culvert use by bats is an issue that has not yet been examined through a robust statewide study.

This research will inform the development of Virginia-specific tools and strategies to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of regulatory coordination for project reviews. The project will be conducted in two phases. Phase I will use literature findings VDOT bat survey data to develop a targeted sampling plan for Phase II field surveys to identify potential conditions where bat presence may be highly unlikely.  Phase I will also include a review of programmatic agreements from other states and gather input from VDOT, USFWS, and other DOT staff to find opportunities to increase the efficiency of consultation process.  The study findings will inform regulatory decisions for streamlining the project review processes and decreasing the workload for Virginia’s transportation and regulatory staff.
]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 10:05:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2617664</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automated Wildlife Detection for Wildlife Vehicle Collision Reduction</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2593929</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Large mammals cross highways to access core habitat areas, presenting significant safety hazards for Oregon drivers. Transportation infrastructure can in turn present significant disruption for wildlife connectivity. Automated wildlife detection systems tailored for Oregon conditions could enable Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to efficiently assess the performance of constructed wildlife passage features, validate predicted wildlife crossing locations, monitor changes in the timing and location of crossing patterns as the climate and populations change, provide cost-effective detection systems for the many areas where crossing structures are not feasible, and most importantly reduce wildlife vehicle collisions.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 11:42:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2593929</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Vehicle Collision Mitigation Phase II - Determining Effectiveness of Wildlife-Vehicle Collision Mitigation Projects Phase II</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2582853</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The research is aimed at estimating passage rates or relative use of crossing structures for large mammals and identify other wildlife species using crossings at constructed and planned wildlife-vehicle collision mitigation projects for a 2-3 year period. In instances where fencing will be constructed during the study, the research team will compare use of crossing structures over time to evaluate the effectiveness of the fencing.
The specific objectives of this study are to: Compare wildlife passage rates or relative use of crossings with studies done in other western states; Identify infrastructure shortcomings or other factors that contribute to low passage rates or low relative use rates; Collate and review wildlife-vehicle collision and carcass collection data to determine the effectiveness of constructed projects in reducing wildlife-vehicle collisions, or at least document baseline wildlife-vehicle collision rates for planned projects; Create a guide for designing effective wildlife crossings and for improving existing drainage structures for mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), elk (Cervus elaphus), black bear (Ursus americanus) and Mountain lion (Puma concolor).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2025 17:51:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2582853</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Performance of the SR 29 Advanced Wildlife Warning System in Collier County</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2569150</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The primary objective is to determine if the newly installed wildlife detection and warning system provides a measurable reduction in wildlife-vehicle related crashes within the detection zone. Secondary objectives include evaluating: (1) the reliability of the advanced wildlife warning system (AWWS) in correctly detecting target wildlife species, and (2) the effectiveness of the AWWS in eliciting positive driver responses when alerted to a hazard in the roadway (increased awareness, vehicle speed reduction and advanced braking).]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2025 12:43:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2569150</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Practices for Wildlife Passage and Habitat Connectivity





</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2558417</link>
      <description><![CDATA[State departments of transportation (DOTs) install wildlife crossing structures and enhance existing structures to provide safe passage for wildlife across roadways. These passages provide safety benefits to motorists by reducing collisions. Other benefits include connecting fragmented wildlife habitats, minimizing property damage and associated costs, and increased safety of maintenance workers by reducing exposure to animal carcasses. 

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) guidebook Wildlife Crossing Structure Handbook Design and Evaluation in North America (2011) is one of several resources available to practitioners. However, research and implementation work since its publication provide new insights that could inform the planning and design for future wildlife crossings. Research is needed to consolidate existing resources and guidance to support state DOTs in identifying effective practices for future designs. 

The objective of this research is to develop a guide that documents effective practices for wildlife passage and habitat connectivity]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2025 20:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2558417</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Development of Alternative Desert Tortoise Crossing Criteria and Designs (NDOT 494-24-803)</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2499403</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) maintains many hundreds of miles of highway in the habitat of the Mojave Desert tortoise, 450 miles of which are protected by tortoise exclusionary fencing. While the exclusionary fencing protects desert tortoises from highway mortality, it does not address the issue of habitat fragmentation, and in fact may add to the problem. Since exclusionary fencing restricts desert tortoise movement even further than the highway itself, it can inhibit or prevent access to seasonal resources, alter tortoise behavior, and can be detrimental to the larger population through reduced gene flow. In some areas, drainage culverts that pass under roadways have been retrofitted into desert tortoise crossings by connecting tortoise exclusionary fencing to the culvert wingwalls. Desert tortoises have been documented using some of these crossings. However, it appears that the design requirements of these drainage features, especially those in high-flow areas, commonly conflict with the movement abilities of the desert tortoise. Many of these culverts have large rocks (rip rap) placed at the openings to minimize the potential for erosion, but the large voids within the rip rap are a major obstacle for tortoise movement, an entrapment hazard, and have been known to cause mortality. NDOT maintenance has attempted to mitigate this issue by backfilling the rip rap with a mix of native gravel and soil. This has limited utility as it does well on flat terrain but is regularly carried away in steeper areas by the voluminous water flows commonly observed in desert flood events. The native soil must be replaced often, which is a burden for NDOT maintenance. Therefore, there is a need to develop criteria and plans for retrofitting culverts into desert tortoise crossings that can withstand multiple large hydraulic events while also being easily navigated by desert tortoises. The objectives of this research include: (1) Identify four culvert crossings along Nevada State Route 160 (SR 160) to evaluate and retrofit into desert tortoise culvert crossings with low maintenance requirements. (2) Obtain topographical surveys to develop creative designs, including engineered plans. (3) Produce one report for each crossing and one final report that provide details of the design efforts performed. The four culvert reports will focus on strengths and weaknesses of each and a design summary. (4) The final report will summarize the design effort, lessons learned, and considerations by each location on what works and what other entities have tried. The reports may include single-purpose crossing design success compared to dual-purpose crossing design. (5) Provide implementation-ready construction plans, specifications, and estimates. Will attempt to develop standard details, proposed designs, and treatment types as applicable and directed.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2025 18:06:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2499403</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Developing a Framework for Large Animal-Vehicle Crash Risk: A Safe System Approach to Cost-Effective Safety Improvements </title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2487320</link>
      <description><![CDATA[In 2020, the Virginia General Assembly enacted The Virginia Wildlife Corridor Action Plan (Code of Virginia § 29.1-579), which directed the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and other state agencies to identify wildlife crossing projects in Virginia by mapping wildlife corridors and identifying areas with a high risk of wildlife-vehicle collisions.  Accurate crash data is critical for identifying strategic opportunities for safety measures, but research shows that police report data underrepresents deer crash volumes by up to nine times. A predictive model that uses a combination of police-reported crashes, roadway attributes, and contextual factors to flag high risk road segments would provide a more realistic indication of risk. This study aims to develop a model to identify road segments at high risk for deer- and black bear-vehicle conflicts. The model will advance the Wildlife Corridor Action Plan’s objective to prioritize wildlife crossing projects and align with the U.S.Department of Transportation (DOT)’s Safe System Approach by proactively improving road safety. A cost-benefit guidance document will be created to complement the road risk model, providing support for funding applications for safety improvement projects. Study deliverables will inform the next Virginia Wildlife Corridor Action Plan (WCAP) version and be accessible to VDOT staff and stakeholders for planning and safety evaluations. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 09:33:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2487320</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Effectiveness of Wildlife Fencing</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2444781</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) has several projects each year, throughout all four regions, related to mitigating wildlife crashes. Projects range from under $100,000 to several million dollars. Adequate research has not been performed in identifying the safety benefits of wildlife fencing. This research will help identify the benefit cost for installing wildlife fencing. Current wildlife projects are justified and determined using only crash history and assumptions of the crash reduction and benefit of installing wildlife fencing. This research will help quantify the reduction in crashes from installing wildlife fencing, providing a better comparison of safety benefit as compared to other safety projects.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2024 09:25:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2444781</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Identification and prioritization of road sections with a relatively high concentration of large wild mammal-vehicle collisions in Gallatin County, Montana, USA</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2437173</link>
      <description><![CDATA[The primary objective of this project is to identify and prioritize the road sections in Gallatin County that have a relatively high concentration of collisions involving large wild mammals. These road sections may then later be evaluated for potential future mitigation measures aimed at 1. Reducing collisions with large wild mammals, and 2. Providing safe passage across roads for large wild mammals, as well as other wildlife species in the area. We acquired the 3 datasets related to large wild mammal-vehicle collisions in Gallatin County: 1. Wildlife-vehicle crash data collected by law enforcement personnel, 2. Carcass removal data collected by road maintenance personnel; and 3. Grizzly bear road mortality data by the U.S. Geological Survey. The carcass removal data and grizzly bear road mortality data were merged into one carcass database. We conducted separate analyses for the crash data and the carcass data. We conducted two different types of analyses to identify and prioritize road sections with the highest number of wildlife-vehicle crashes and carcasses: 1. Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) analysis that identifies road sections with the highest concentration of collisions, and 2. Getis-Ord Gi* analysis identifies road sections that have statistically significant spatial clusters of collisions. There was great similarity between the hotspots identified through the Kernel Density Estimation analyses for 2008-2022 and 2018-2022 for both the crash and carcass removal data. The same was true for the Getis-Ord Gi* analyses. Especially sections of I-90 and US Hwy 191 between I-90 through Four Corners to the mouth of Gallatin Canyon had the highest concentration of wild animal crashes and large wild animal carcasses. Based on the Getis-Ord Gi* analyses, these road sections generally had concentrations of crashes and carcasses that were significantly higher than expected should the crashes and carcasses have been randomly distributed. In other words, these road sections do not only have the highest concentration of crashes and carcasses, but the identification of these road sections is not based on coincidence. These road sections have a concentration of crashes and carcasses that is beyond random.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:38:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2437173</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Modeling Traffic Noise and Light on Natural Landscapes at the State Scale</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2431331</link>
      <description><![CDATA[Anthropogenic noise and light have been shown to impact wildlife behavior, distribution, movement, and population fitness and survival. Traffic noise and light can inhibit wildlife use of areas adjacent to roads, impair wildlife perception of traffic risks, and cause a barrier effect to wildlife occurrence and movement well beyond road edges. A critical action being taken by states to repair wildlife movement across roadways is construction of wildlife crossings, theoretically providing a safe passage across roads. Planning the location of these crossings and to some degree their design currently does not take into account traffic noise and light impacts on wildlife approaching the structures. The researchers will develop a method for statewide modeling of noise and light intrusion into areas adjacent to roads to aid locating and designing crossings to maximize wildlife approach and use. These models would have the added benefit of estimating traffic impacts as part of environmental analysis associated with delivering transportation projects. The researchers will use the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Model (TNM) and light-scale tools in the geographic information systems (GIS) software ArcGIS to model the “noise-scape” and “light-scape” at high-resolution around California (CA) state highways and I-5 in Oregon (OR) and Washington (WA). The researchers will use 1/10 mile post-miles as the sources of traffic noise and light and model propagation of both across adjacent landscapes out to at least 1 kilometer. The researchers will validate the models in the field using transects of noise and light measurements. The outputs will be digital (raster) maps that show the high and low impact areas. The researchers will share these data through a data portal being supported through a separate grant from the Wildlife Conservation Network. Although the focus is on wildlife impacts, there would be secondary benefits for planners in communities. The researchers will share the method developed through publications and conference presentations.]]></description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:18:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2431331</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Assessment of Aquatic Organism Passage Through 3-Sided and 4-Sided Culverts on High Quality Streams  
</title>
      <link>https://rip.trb.org/View/2427732</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When culverts are placed into streams, it is important to ensure that the culvert does not inhibit aquatic organism passage (AOP). AOP refers to the capacity of a structure to maintain the natural continuity of the habitat, stream flow velocities, and depth so that aquatic organisms (e.g., fish, macroinvertebrates, salamanders, etc.) can move through the structure, both up and down stream, uninhibited. This research study is important for both Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) and the Army Corps of Engineers (ACE) standards as well as Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) best practices. To ensure the most appropriate structures are utilized in high quality streams that support the viability of aquatic life, research is needed to determine the actual impact of these structures and their support of the passage of natural organisms in streams. The goal of this research is to determine the impact to AOP of 3- and 4-sided box culverts in high quality streams in Ohio and provide recommendations for the best applications based on stream characteristics. The objectives of this research include the following: (1) evaluate AOP for vertebrates and macroinvertebrates in 3- and 4-sided box culverts on high quality streams; (2) evaluate barriers to AOP by culvert type; (3) identify limitations of each culvert type, considering natural features, such as, but not limited to landscape and geology; (4) provide data set(s) demonstrating viability of AOP in culverts (or not) based on a variety of factors, such as, but not limited to slope, culvert type, velocity, etc.; and (5) recommendations for practices to improve the viability of AOP in culverts, such as, the use of products designed to support AOP, burying inverts in 4-sided structures, etc. ]]></description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2024 11:19:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://rip.trb.org/View/2427732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>